· Full time · Estadio Azteca, Mexico City
Right call — Mexico through (won 2–0).
A knockout can't end level. This is each side's chance to go through — win in 90 minutes, in extra time, or on penalties. It's a different question from the win probability above, which is who wins the match in regulation.
Heads up: this tie has a real chance (about 16%) of going to penalties, and a shootout is close to a 50/50 — they're near-random, so we don't pretend to call them. The deeper a tie goes, the more it's a coin flip.
Who wins in normal time — the 90-minute win/draw/loss. “Who advances” above folds in extra time and penalties.
Mexico 46%, draw 28%, Ecuador 26%.
This is our latest read, with current confirmed team news folded into the model (see “What we considered” below). Our track record always grades the locked pre-match call we made before lineups were posted — so this number may differ slightly from the one on the results page. We never rewrite a locked prediction.
Every factor the model weighed for this match — including the ones worth nothing. Each is capped so it can nudge, never flip, a clear matchup. A “no change” line means we considered it and had no reliable data — that transparency is the point, not a gap.
Mexico is the host nation: +55 Elo home-field advantage (applied in the goal model).
Mexico and Ecuador are separated by almost nothing — the model treats this as a genuine toss-up, despite Mexico's home advantage and slight possession lean. Ecuador's compact shape will frustrate; Mexico must break it without overcommitting. One goal could settle a tight, edgy affair.
Mexico's ability to unlock Ecuador's organised defence versus Ecuador's counter-threat on the break.
Home advantage and possession lean Mexico's way, but the model's low confidence flags how volatile this genuinely is.
AI-generated context based on a statistical model. Full-time/regulation result only. Not betting advice; no specific current team-news is used.
Display-only — none of this is used in the prediction above.
Context only — these confirmed lineups are not used in the prediction above. By kick-off, public team news is already reflected in any market line.
Lineups not available. We only show a confirmed starting XI when we can match this exact fixture to a Flashscore event — we never guess or invent one.
Venue not available. We only show a stadium when we can match this exact fixture to a Flashscore event or it's in our scheduled-venue data — we never guess one.
Venue is shown for information only and is not used in the prediction.
Real measured stats for this match — shown for transparency. They are not part of the prediction above, which is a pre-match estimate from team ratings.
Match stats not available. They appear once a match is under way and Flashscore is carrying live stats for it — we never invent them.
Screenshot to share — the honesty note travels with it.
Predictions are estimates, not advice. WisePicks is a fan dashboard, not a betting product. The numbers come from a simple statistical model. They carry real uncertainty and can be wrong. We don't show odds or encourage gambling.
Expected goals and control are derived estimates from the model's ratings — indicative leans, not measured match stats.
Over 2.5 goals: 48% · Under 2.5: 52%.
Who advances
No confirmed lineup, and no tracked key players for Mexico (0).
No confirmed lineup, and no tracked key players for Ecuador (0).
shorter-than-average squad (5 tallest outfielders ~187cm vs a ~190cm field) → -5 Elo set-piece nudge. Estimated from squad height (a rough proxy, weighted toward aerial defence); modest by design.
shorter-than-average squad (5 tallest outfielders ~189cm vs a ~190cm field) → -1 Elo set-piece nudge. Estimated from squad height (a rough proxy, weighted toward aerial defence); modest by design.
Over 10 tournament matches: xG-for 1.26/g, xG-against 1.37/g (xGD -0.11/g, -0.3 SD vs the field). Shrunk for a 10-game sample → -4 Elo. The team ran hotter than its chance quality; a bounded, modest chance-quality nudge.
Over 7 tournament matches: xG-for 1.68/g, xG-against 1.48/g (xGD +0.20/g, +0.3 SD vs the field). Shrunk for a 7-game sample → +3 Elo. The team created better chances than it converted; a bounded, modest chance-quality nudge.
Disabled by flag (0).
Disabled by flag (0).
Disabled by flag (0).
Considered — deferred (0). Extreme heat/humidity mainly lowers tempo and scoring, not who wins; we don't apply it as an outcome factor.
Considered — no weather data for this venue/date (0). Weather only nudges the goal total; it does not move who wins.
Host-crowd effect is already counted inside Home advantage — not double-counted here (0).
Player availability uses a curated key-player heuristic against the confirmed starting XI (via Flashscore), not a fitted impact model. Weather is real match-day data from Open-Meteo and only nudges the goal total — its measured effect on who wins is ~zero. We only ever apply a factor on real, confirmed data; otherwise it is exactly 0.
At least one factor moved the prediction on real confirmed data; the rest were considered and contributed nothing.